The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han
Rarely does one read books that change their—already formed—views towards society. Maybe even more of a rare event is when a book makes one doubt their life philosophies and deepest goals.
The Burnout Society by Hegelian philosopher Byung-Chul Han is short yet genius. It is composed of eight chapters. Throughout these chapters the author distils an analysis into the 21st century global society that shatters the social imaginary by being both astoundingly radical and incredibly insightful.
I.
Byung-Chul starts—in the first chapter—with a core argument of the book's thesis:
Neurological illnesses such as depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), borderline personality disorder (BPD), and burnout syndrome [...] do not follow from the negativity of what is immunologically foreign, but from an excess of positivity.
The author defines the era of the past century as an immunological era, which has resulted to our current era being deprived of any negativity as it has been successfully purged.
The epoch sought to distinguish clearly between inside and outside, friend and foe, self and other. The Cold War also followed an immunological pattern. [...] Even if [something] has no hostile intentions, even if it poses nodanger, it is eliminated on the basis of its Otherness.
II.
Continuing in the second chapter, Byung-Chul talks about today's society not being Foucault’s disciplinary society, but rather an achievement society.
In contrast to a disciplinary society, which is a society of negativity that prohibits (don't/should), an achievement society is one that positively encourages (can). Still, Byung-Chul says, the achievement-subject remains disciplined.
Clearly, the drive to maximize production inhabits the social unconscious.
With this, the author touches on the edges of Cornelius Castoriadis' concept of the social imaginary. Being achievement-subjects, we are much more productive. Discipline-subjects work because they shouldn't be slackers; achievement-subjects work because they can become millionaires.
In this way, the achievement-subject being exploits itself. Voluntarily, it becomes both the abuser and the abused.
Disciplinary society's [...] negativity produces madmen and criminals. In contrast, achievement society creates depressives and losers.
III.
In the third chapter, Byung-Chul talks about boredom. In praise of idleness, like Bertrand said—yet not quite in the same sense.
The afforementioned excessive positivity of our society leads to excessive stimuli and information. As a result, a new form of attention develops: hyperattention. Characterised by rapid diffusion of information and fast change of focus, hyperattention means that our tolerance for boredom abates.
But, boredom is quite important. The author claims it to be fundamental for the spark of creativity to arise.
To handle this excess of stimuli we employ multitasking. Byung-Chul remarks that this is a step backwards in terms of cultural quality. Multitasking is common to animals who while eating must be careful not to be eaten. Deep focus instead is the intellectual technique to which we owe humanity's cultural achievements.
If sleep represents the high point of bodily relaxation, deep boredom is the peak of mental relaxation.
IV.
The fourth chapter of the book is titled Vita Activa. Hannah Arendt described this concept in her book The Human Condition, in which she wanted to redeem it against vita contemplativa. According to Hannah, vita activa is being misinterpreted as just restlessness, whereas it can actually be heroic action.
She says modern society forces humans into animal laborans; a concept that designates humanity's defining characteristic as labour, rather than thinking. As animal laborans, there is no vita activa—only passivity.
Byung-Chul states that animal laborans are no more, though. An individual out of Hannah's model is supposed to relinquish their individuality (ego) and merge in the "over-all life process of the species". Instead, in today's achievement society ego is cultivated by labour.
In the second half of the chapter, the author speaks about the fleetingness of modern life. Hyperattention (chapter 3) is our society's reaction to this lack of being, as he calls it. Everyone carries a labour camp inside them, in which, he says, "one is simultaneously prisoner and guard, victim and perpetrator".
Even religions, as thanatotechnics that would remove the fear of death and produce a feeling of duration, have run their course.
V.
Chapter five is where Byung-Chul talks about the power to say no, i.e. the power to express negativity.
According to Hegel, negativity is precisely what keeps existence [Dasein] alive.
If positive potency is the power to do something and impotency is the exact opposite, that is the inability to act, then there is also negative potency which is the power to not do something.
Arguments from the first and the third chapter now connect: we lack negative potency as we have purged ourselves of all negativity. Lacking the ability to say no to something (say no as in block it and not perceive it), the result is an excess of stimuli: hyperattention.
The author also touches on Zen meditation here, in which the objective to free oneself from all distractions requires activity.
VI.
Chapter six is about Bartleby, the Scrivener, a short story by Herman Melville. Bartleby, who's an above-average skilled scribe, starts responding to all requests with "I would prefer not to".
Byung-Chul analyses how the society portrayed in the story is a disciplinary society. Further, he notices a lack of excess positivity, at which point he disagrees with an analysis of the story by Giorgio Agamben. According to Byung-Chul, Bartleby is not the absolute potency. Him being an employee of the Dead Letter Office, also, depicts a negativity that contradicts Agamben’s ontotheological interpretation.
Byung-Chul concludes that the story is not really about de-creation, but rather about exhaustion.
The exclamation that ends the tale is both a lament and an indictment: “Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!”
VII.
The penultimate chapter is called The Society of Tiredness. Bilingual reviewers say this chapter title is also a better translation of the original German book title Müdigkeitsgesellschaft.
Here, the author draws a lot from Peter Handke's Essay on Tiredness. Tiredness in our achievement society is solitary tiredness. This is in contrast to another kind; the tiredness that trusts in the world. While the trusting tiredness dissolves ego and makes room for an Otherness, solitary tiredness results in an exhausted ego.
[Handke] calls it “we-tiredness”. I am not tired “of you,” as he puts it, but rather I am tired “with you”
VIII.
In the final chapter, Byung-Chul claims that today's achievement society is much different than the disciplinary society that Freud developed psychoanalysis for. So much different that he believes that a person's psyche is, also, much different and thus psychoanalysis is irrelevant for the achievement-subject.
In our society of achievement, there is less and less negativity and prohibition. There is instead more and more freedom. An achievement-subject does not work out of duty (defined by others; targeted at others), but rather out of pleasure (defined by itself; targeted at itself).
This absence of relation to the Other is problematic especially in terms of gratification. The achievement-subject cannot draw satisfaction from its work because there’s no one to commend it. Hence, the achievement-subject feels compelled to do more and more.
This combination of lack of satisfaction and self-exploitation (chapter 2) results in burnout. As the achievement-subject is subject to no one but itself, it liberates itself into a project. It is liberation, because the achievement-subject does that in the name of freedom, of being free to do that which pleases it. And it is a project—and not a subject—in the etymological sense, as it is not subjugated. It (the subject itself) needs to be something positive, after all.
In this way, though, the violence does not disappear. The violence now originates from itself. As we said in chapter 2, this is now a self-exploitation. It is represented as a freedom, yet it is still a (self-) coercion.
This result makes the capitalist system much more efficient as self-exploitation includes the illusion of freedom. Freedom and violence now coincide.
In the final pages, Byung-Chul examines Agamben's homo sacer. He declares:
[The homines sacri of achievement society] cannot be killed at all. Their life equals that of the undead. They are too alive to die, and too dead to live.
Epilogue
When I started reading this book I thought the author was just playing with words. How can immunology describe an era and somehow this metaphor to result in mental conditions?
And how does all this reconcile with current psychology? My guess would be: not well. The obvious argument that what the book describes is just a different—i.e. a philosophical—approach probably satisfies neither philosophers nor psychologists.
Yet, even though the first chapter felt silly, as I continued reading, everything made sense. Somehow, it made total sense. I remain cautious of its thesis but at the same time I feel my views towards the world have overturned. In an attempt to either verify or disprove its arguments I find myself trying to examine things through Byung-Chul’s lens now.
In conclusion, I'm quite astounded by The Burnout Society. So much that I wonder—how is to exist before having read it?